https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89898
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>In the following, the invalid function template definition is accepted in
>c++2a mode:
How is this invalid C++20 code? C++20 allows class non-type template
arguments.
X<A{}> is a valid type now in C++20.
This is defining a template function whos template argument is of type X<A{}>
E.g this is also valid:
template<X<A{}> a> void f () { }
I Know it looks confusing but I don't see anything wrong with this code.
