https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #18 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > > > > Thanks for the example, it looks useful! Now the field fp_expressions is > > generic, one target specific summary class seems required then. And not sure > > if the users still have interests/senses to further try flto when they fail > > to get expected inlining with some basic optimization options. :) > > Note the Comment 7, fixing that people will see the error also in non-LTO > mode. Yeah, the patch draft in comment 17 can make it consistent. Thanks for the finding again! I think I was misunderstanding on ipa_fn_summaries, thought it's only generated for LTO. Your reply makes me conclude it's generated for both. :)
