https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The class has a doxygen comment. I see no benefit to adding a single sentence
about the operator() to one of the classes and not the other ones in the group.
Closing because nobody is motivated to do anything about this. If you want
improvements then make them yourself. I started doing it twenty years ago but
now I'm doing more important changes to the library.
