https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101080

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-06-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  Also happens with -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize which produces

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000004003b7 in main ()
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function main:
   0x00000000004003a0 <+0>:     movzbl 0x200c95(%rip),%eax        # 0x60103c
<d>
   0x00000000004003a7 <+7>:     cmp    $0x14,%al
   0x00000000004003a9 <+9>:     je     0x4003da <main+58>
   0x00000000004003ab <+11>:    nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
   0x00000000004003b0 <+16>:    add    $0x4,%eax
   0x00000000004003b3 <+19>:    cmp    $0x14,%al
   0x00000000004003b5 <+21>:    jne    0x4003b0 <main+16>
=> 0x00000000004003b7 <+23>:    andb   $0xf8,0x186(%rip)        # 0x400544 <c>
   0x00000000004003be <+30>:    movl   $0x0,0x200c70(%rip)        # 0x601038
<e>
   0x00000000004003c8 <+40>:    movq   $0x0,0x200c5d(%rip)        # 0x601030
<f>
   0x00000000004003d3 <+51>:    movb   $0x14,0x200c62(%rip)        # 0x60103c
<d>
   0x00000000004003da <+58>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0x00000000004003dc <+60>:    ret    

simpler IL testcase (elide g) - note the inlining is critical.

struct a {
  unsigned b : 3;
} const c;
char d;
int e;
long f;
static void g(const struct a h)
{
  for (; d != 20; d = d + 4) {
      int i = h.b;
      e = h.b;
      f = h.b || 0;
  }
}
int main()
{
  g(c);
}

so the issue is we store to 'c' which resides in .rodata - suspect this is
a dup of the pending SRA issue.  -fno-tree-sra fixes it.

But it's a nice testcase.

Reply via email to