https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499

--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 26 May 2021, aldyh at redhat dot com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
> 
> --- Comment #26 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com> ---
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:34 AM rguenther at suse dot de
> <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > It's probably too strict for multiple_of_p which is fine with
> > overflows that preserve modulo behavior.
> 
> Could you provide an example?

Like with DECL_SIZE being D.1234 * 8 as unsigned multiplication
and the query whether it's a multiple of 8.  Once you have no
range for 'D.1234' you will signal overflow (correctly) but
even then it's still a mutliple of 8.

Reply via email to