https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is invalid because you wrote:
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923

And not:
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923_16

The first is a real type which is already rounded to 64bit.

When I used the _16, I get the correct answer.

Reply via email to