https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089

--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 
---
Is this really a costing issue, or should we instead reject the
BB fallback if it leaves any scalar COND_EXPRs around?  This would
be similar to the way that we reject IFN_MASK_LOAD/STORE calls,
except that the COND_EXPR tests would only apply to unvectorised
statements and so would need to be tested after SLP discovery
rather than before it.  (Ideally IFN_MASK_LOAD/STORE would work
like that too.)

Reply via email to