https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=94006
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PR 100322 shows that this missed-optimization causes a regression for code
using std::chrono::duration types. Since C++20 their comparisons use
operator<=> and so produce much worse code than the same source compiled as
C++17.
