https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95410
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I notice the other two don't produce the same tree level either (but the > same assembly code in the end): Oh the same assembly in the end was on aarch64, on x86_64 they are not. Oh and that problem is PR 95409. I will put my analysis of the differences there.