https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99613
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb6efb9d909323e41fa0a8abbe805eb32d1659ea commit r9-9432-gcb6efb9d909323e41fa0a8abbe805eb32d1659ea Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 16 21:17:44 2021 +0100 c++: Ensure correct destruction order of local statics [PR99613] As mentioned in the PR, if end of two constructions of local statics is strongly ordered, their destructors should be run in the reverse order. As we run __cxa_guard_release before calling __cxa_atexit, it is possible that we have two threads that access two local statics in the same order for the first time, one thread wins the __cxa_guard_acquire on the first one but is rescheduled in between the __cxa_guard_release and __cxa_atexit calls, then the other thread is scheduled and wins __cxa_guard_acquire on the second one and calls __cxa_quard_release and __cxa_atexit and only afterwards the first thread calls its __cxa_atexit. This means a variable whose completion of the constructor strongly happened after the completion of the other one will be destructed after the other variable is destructed. The following patch fixes that by swapping the __cxa_guard_release and __cxa_atexit calls. 2021-03-16 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/99613 * decl.c (expand_static_init): For thread guards, call __cxa_atexit before calling __cxa_guard_release rather than after it. Formatting fixes. (cherry picked from commit 1703937a05b8b95bc29d2de292387dfd9eb7c9a3)
