https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #14) > To summarize: > > * should a wording defect be raised against std::to_address(Ptr), to state > that pointer_traits<Ptr> being well-formed is actually a prerequisite? I'd prefer if pointer_traits was just SFINAE friendly. > * should LWG3446's resolution be amended? See https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3541 > * if there's going to be a GCC 10.3, is the commit above solving LWG3446 > going to be cherry-picked into it? Otherwise, either one blacklists GCC 10, > or has to specialize pointer_traits there as a workaround (?). It missed the 10.3 release, but it's on the gcc-10 branch as r10-9698, which will be in GCC 10.4: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32a859531e854382c18abf0b14a306d83f793eb5 That also includes the fix for LWG 3541.
