https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So perhaps just:
--- gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c.jj 2021-01-04 10:25:38.892233156 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c 2021-04-09 12:46:27.466847728 +0200
@@ -124,9 +124,8 @@ public:
alloca_type_and_limit (enum alloca_type type,
wide_int i) : type(type), limit(i) { }
alloca_type_and_limit (enum alloca_type type) : type(type)
- { if (type == ALLOCA_BOUND_MAYBE_LARGE
- || type == ALLOCA_BOUND_DEFINITELY_LARGE)
- limit = wi::to_wide (integer_zero_node);
+ {
+ limit = wi::to_wide (integer_zero_node);
}
};
in this case? Explicitly trying to have limit member conditionally
uninitialized seems like a bad idea to me.
