https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99859
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > For the global vars (so PR80039 too), can the problem be anything but when > cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr is called on such an object (or part > thereof)? > Unfortunately, ctx->object might be NULL, perhaps we could stick a copy of > that into ctx->global->object (get_base_address of the outermost object it > is called on)? Sounds good to me FWIW (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > > And in #c9 you're right that it could be embedded in CONSTRUCTORs too. > > Wonder if cp_walk_tree &arg to find the ADDR_EXPR of heap var addresses and > ctx->global->object address would be enough. Sounds good to me too. Using cp_walk_tree means we'd also detect the case where the argument is 'heap_ptr + CST'.
