https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99459
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > So perhaps: > 2021-03-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR c++/99459 > * coroutines.cc (build_co_await): Look through NOP_EXPRs in > build_special_member_call return value to find the CALL_EXPR. > > --- gcc/cp/coroutines.cc.jj 2021-03-05 21:51:48.671185716 +0100 > +++ gcc/cp/coroutines.cc 2021-03-08 10:53:13.187959339 +0100 > @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a, > = build_special_member_call (a, complete_dtor_identifier, > NULL, a_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL, > tf_none); > + if (dummy && CONVERT_EXPR_P (dummy)) > + dummy = TREE_OPERAND (dummy, 0); > dummy = dummy ? TREE_OPERAND (CALL_EXPR_FN (dummy), 0) > : NULL_TREE; > if (dummy && coro_diagnose_throwing_fn (dummy)) > @@ -1031,6 +1033,8 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a, > = build_special_member_call (e_proxy, complete_dtor_identifier, > NULL, o_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL, > tf_none); > + if (dummy && CONVERT_EXPR_P (dummy)) > + dummy = TREE_OPERAND (dummy, 0); > dummy = dummy ? TREE_OPERAND (CALL_EXPR_FN (dummy), 0) > : NULL_TREE; > if (dummy && coro_diagnose_throwing_fn (dummy)) > > ? looks reasonable to me - but I have no way to test it at present.
