https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
--- Comment #9 from xiezhiheng at huawei dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > So, is this fixed by any of the > r11-2190-gbf592b2ff776aef71c91924cdb5e0d10488496cf > r11-2448-g072a8b8fb6e861d8ac2db847bcc81dbcb1ef1b35 > r11-2554-g35ffd4d16d7e3dbba297da788414a673530b7817 > r11-2874-ge3684bcbf88b438ca1f0749de8843ddd5b72ad59 > r11-2901-gd7738d4fde5b248b6814f5dd20617eecd33601df > r11-2902-g795944c4563b4d9abf6d4bd9963f41fa1249d9d9 > r11-3844-gca4938fa8e0e72fd59307f1f058db800c1e4a8f3 > r11-4131-g4fb0ee84ad8c9b789e2465c85ea048e3320365b0 > r11-4384-g2d5aad691f5bd605cfc27ce16a1f2d023cd21f75 > r11-4565-gc517003e719cb045d755dd4b074a1306d5567be4 > r11-4665-gc229693ba6f5abb245fc71ebef4b8f7720e8ccf5 > r11-4666-g60be12c32cb3a07a64efdab1f0ee6fd74536cc93 > r11-4875-g1900707e56ae8c913f1d16426065e128b1abbb14 > commits that refer to this PR number but none of them referred to it in > ChangeLog entry, or not? Not yet. We fixed part of the intrinsics. But like saturating intrinsics (used in this PR), because GCC does not model fpsr register but tests it in some test cases, simply setting the FLAG of saturating intrinsics to none would cause these test cases to fail. So it need take further considerations for saturating intrinsics.
