https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99270
Bug ID: 99270
Summary: Testsuite 27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc failure on
DragonFly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Testsuite on x86_64-*-dragonfly gives:
Running target unix
FAIL: 27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc (test for excess errors)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /build/trunk/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/build/trunk/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-B/opt/gcc11f/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/bin/
-B/opt/gcc11f/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/lib/ -isystem
/opt/gcc11f/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/include -isystem
/opt/gcc11f/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/sys-include -fchecking=1
-B/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-fmessage-length=0 -fno-show-column -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -O2
-DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9
-I/build/trunk/x86_64-unknown-dragonfly5.9/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -S -o types_std.s
/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc:25: error:
aggregate 'FILE gnu::f' has incomplete type and cannot be defined
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: 27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/data/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/headers/cstdio/types_std.cc:25: error:
aggregate 'FILE gnu::f' has incomplete type and cannot be defined
extra_tool_flags are:
On DragonFly the FILE type is declared as opaque struct and its internals are
never exposed on purpose:
typedef struct __FILE FILE;
Even cppreference mentions that std::FILE may be semantically non-copyable.
Could "std::FILE f;" test be excluded by #if !defined(__DragonFly__) or simply
changed to a more usual use case of "std::FILE *fp;" ?
