https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99083
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
As a side note, it is strange that ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER somehow require
REG_ALLOC_ORDER to be defined (c.f. Comment #3), while its documentation says:
The macro body should not assume anything about the contents of
'reg_alloc_order' before execution of the macro.
This mess begs for the redefinition of REG_ALLOC_ORDER/ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER
as a target hook.
