https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88735

--- Comment #5 from martin <mscfd at gmx dot net> ---
Hi Ev,

the testcase is actually derived from a smart pointer implementation (where i
is the reference count, shared between all smart pointers [hence allocatable
will not do], and incremented upon sharing). It would be nice to have the bug
fixed, though I have seen too many (subtle) bugs with assignments by different
compilers that I try not to use them. But thanks for providing a better and
more thorough testcase.

Reply via email to