https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91903
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Will Schmidt <wills...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91a95ad2ae0e0f2fa953fafe55ff2ec32c8277d5 commit r11-6984-g91a95ad2ae0e0f2fa953fafe55ff2ec32c8277d5 Author: Will Schmidt <will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri Oct 23 17:28:17 2020 -0500 [PATCH, rs6000] improve vec_ctf invalid parameter handling. Hi, Per PR91903, GCC ICEs when we attempt to pass a variable (or out of range value) into the vec_ctf() builtin. Per investigation, the parameter checking exists for this builtin with the int types, but was missing for the long long types. This problem also occurs for the vec_cts() builtin, which is also fixed by this patch. This patch adds the missing CODE_FOR_* entries to the rs6000_expand_binup_builtin to cover that scenario. This patch also updates some existing tests to remove calls to vec_ctf() and vec_cts() that contain negative values. PR target/91903 2020-01-29 Will Schmidt <will_schm...@vnet.ibm.com> gcc/ChangeLog: * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (rs6000_expand_binup_builtin): Add clauses for CODE_FOR_vsx_xvcvuxddp_scale and CODE_FOR_vsx_xvcvsxddp_scale to the parameter checking code. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/powerpc/pr91903.c: New test. * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1.fold.h: Update. * gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-2.c: Update.
