https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> > With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR.
> [...]
> > z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
>
> > Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase?
>
> It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. Only
> glancing at the GCC 9 log files:
>
> I think the patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 96100
> and PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing.
The patch for PRs 96100/101 was backported to 9-branch on 28th December.
Both testcases run fine with 9-branch now. They even give the intended result
:-)
Before closing, I will add a testcase to master. I have taken the PR and
reopened it.
Cheers
Paul
