https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98861

--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20)
> 1. Freestanding C++ in the current situation is very problematic. (You do
> not have memcpy, you do not have std::move. You do not have std::forward.
> You do not have std::addressof().

Freestanding libstdc++ provides std::move, std::forward and std::addressof.

Reply via email to