https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|11.0 |9.4
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[11 Regression] wrong use |[9/10/11 Regression] wrong
|of bfxil at -O1 |use of bfxil at -O1
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That change has been introduced in
r9-2905-g2dc09f66b3b49d821e4bd68d3c97ff51d5e080d4 , so I think we have at least
latent wrong-code in 9 and 10 too.
