https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531

--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #3)
> Oh, I see what you mean.
> 
> FWIW this is the tip of a deceptively simple, but actually complex, iceberg.

[for Darwin] These tests were working on the modules branch (although that
might not be any help of course).  IIRC - I did a small amount of debugging and
found that (on Darwin) the underlying complaint was that it was not expecting a
__cxa_xxxxxx function decl in the position that one appeared).

Reply via email to