https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> --- On 12/30/20 10:30 AM, glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 > > --- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot > fu-berlin.de> --- > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10) >> So if that bisection is accurate, the only way this could be failing would >> be if something with a deprecated attribute is being used. >> >> Maybe some printfs in warn_deprecated_use? But again, I'm a bit surprised >> by the bisection results. > I have verified it. I checked out eede1a6bf3a4f33fa5afef9e4dfc80c4dd89eeb3, > reproduced the problem. Then reverted the change and it worked again. > > I honestly don't understand either how that commit could break the build. > >> http://3.14.90.209:8080/job/m68k-linux-gnu/ >> >> Has the most recent build results from my tester. As you can see everything >> built and regression tested on Dec 9. Dec 15 had a successful bootstrap, >> but glibc failed due to a relatively minor bug in glibc. > Is that a native bootstrap on qemu with "jit" enabled? native bootstrap with qemu. Don't offhand remember if jit is enabled. If not I can probably turn that on for the next one. jeff
