https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98010
Bug ID: 98010
Summary: [OpenACC] 'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options'
should consider 'flag_openacc' in addition to
'flag_openmp'?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
'gcc/fortran/options.c:gfc_post_options':
[...]
else if (!flag_automatic && flag_openmp)
gfc_warning_now (0, "Flag %<-fno-automatic%> overwrites %<-frecursive%>
implied by "
"%<-fopenmp%>");
else if (flag_max_stack_var_size != -2 && flag_recursive)
gfc_warning_now (0, "Flag %<-frecursive%> overwrites
%<-fmax-stack-var-size=%d%>",
flag_max_stack_var_size);
else if (flag_max_stack_var_size != -2 && flag_openmp)
gfc_warning_now (0, "Flag %<-fmax-stack-var-size=%d%> overwrites
%<-frecursive%> "
"implied by %<-fopenmp%>", flag_max_stack_var_size);
[...]
/* Implied -frecursive; implemented as -fmax-stack-var-size=-1. */
if (flag_max_stack_var_size == -2 && flag_openmp && flag_automatic)
{
flag_recursive = 1;
flag_max_stack_var_size = -1;
[...]
If that indeed doesn't apply to OpenACC, too, then let's please add some "dummy
handling" to make this explicit, to show that we did consider this.
