https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thank you for the testing. Neither of the suggested changes help us. The core issue is that gcov does not know if it's called from a free/malloc function. That said, I see currently 2 possible fixes: 1. help from a malloc library that uses __gcov_supress_malloc/__gcov_allow_malloc: commit ee382a226ba0e76e2242dcbb4768033a4809a890 Author: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> Date: Fri Nov 6 16:59:43 2020 +0100 WIP patch. diff --git a/libgcc/Makefile.in b/libgcc/Makefile.in index d6075d32bd4..b235231f9d6 100644 --- a/libgcc/Makefile.in +++ b/libgcc/Makefile.in @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ LIBGCOV_PROFILER = _gcov_interval_profiler \ LIBGCOV_INTERFACE = _gcov_dump _gcov_fork \ _gcov_execl _gcov_execlp \ _gcov_execle _gcov_execv _gcov_execvp _gcov_execve _gcov_reset \ - _gcov_lock_unlock + _gcov_lock_unlock _gcov_supress_malloc _gcov_allow_malloc LIBGCOV_DRIVER = _gcov libgcov-merge-objects = $(patsubst %,%$(objext),$(LIBGCOV_MERGE)) diff --git a/libgcc/gcov.h b/libgcc/gcov.h index 0e3eed31032..444f996692e 100644 --- a/libgcc/gcov.h +++ b/libgcc/gcov.h @@ -33,4 +33,12 @@ extern void __gcov_reset (void); extern void __gcov_dump (void); +/* Prevent from calling malloc. */ + +extern void __gcov_supress_malloc (void); + +/* Allow calling malloc. */ + +extern void __gcov_allow_malloc (void); + #endif /* GCC_GCOV_H */ diff --git a/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c b/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c index 3a8a5bf44b8..bcfc38b85c3 100644 --- a/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c +++ b/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ void __gcov_reset (void) {} void __gcov_dump (void) {} #endif +#ifdef L_gcov_supress_malloc +void __gcov_supress_malloc (void) {} +#endif + +#ifdef L_gcov_allow_malloc +void __gcov_allow_malloc (void) {} +#endif + #else extern __gthread_mutex_t __gcov_mx ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN; @@ -174,6 +182,20 @@ __gcov_dump (void) #endif /* L_gcov_dump */ +#ifdef L_gcov_supress_malloc +void __gcov_supress_malloc (void) +{ + __gcov_block_malloc = 1; +} +#endif /* L_gcov_supress_malloc */ + +#ifdef L_gcov_allow_malloc +void __gcov_allow_malloc (void) +{ + __gcov_block_malloc = 0; +} +#endif /* L_gcov_block_malloc */ + #ifdef L_gcov_fork /* A wrapper for the fork function. We reset counters in the child so that they are not counted twice. */ diff --git a/libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c b/libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c index 45ab93c9776..b83b230cd9c 100644 --- a/libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c +++ b/libgcc/libgcov-profiler.c @@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ __thread #endif struct indirect_call_tuple __gcov_indirect_call; +// TODO: move to a proper place +#if defined(HAVE_CC_TLS) && !defined (USE_EMUTLS) +__thread +#endif +int __gcov_block_malloc; + /* By default, the C++ compiler will use function addresses in the vtable entries. Setting TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS to nonzero tells the compiler to use function descriptors instead. The value diff --git a/libgcc/libgcov.h b/libgcc/libgcov.h index e70cf63b414..2eaed9548ea 100644 --- a/libgcc/libgcov.h +++ b/libgcc/libgcov.h @@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ struct indirect_call_tuple /* Pointer to counters. */ gcov_type *counters; }; + +extern +#if defined(HAVE_CC_TLS) && !defined (USE_EMUTLS) +__thread +#endif +int __gcov_block_malloc; /* Exactly one of these will be active in the process. */ extern struct gcov_master __gcov_master; @@ -428,7 +434,12 @@ allocate_gcov_kvp (void) #endif if (new_node == NULL) - new_node = (struct gcov_kvp *)xcalloc (1, sizeof (struct gcov_kvp)); + { +#if !defined(IN_GCOV_TOOL) + if (!__gcov_block_malloc) + new_node = (struct gcov_kvp *)xcalloc (1, sizeof (struct gcov_kvp)); +#endif + } return new_node; } 2) make a dynamic allocation for counters for TOPN at the very beginning in __gcov_init. @Honza: What do you think about it?