https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97018
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Summary|[10/11 Regression] FAIL: |[11 Regression] FAIL:
|gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float |gcc.target/i386/l_fma_float
|_1.c scan-assembler-times |_1.c scan-assembler-times
|vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on |vfnmsub[123]+ss 32 on
|Linux/x86_64 (-m64 |Linux/x86_64 (-m64
|-march=cascadelake) |-march=cascadelake)
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Sunil Pandey from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Do they PASS on the GCC 10 branch?
>
> GCC 10 branch has same issue. Same patch should be applied to GCC 10 too.
They have been failing on GCC 10 branch for a while. They aren't a recent
regression. No plan to fix.
