https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96868
--- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt dot org> --- Thanks: I was confused (as I think will many folks be). The examples for designated initialisers in C++20 on cppreference cite this behaviour as being useful^. Of course I understand it can be misused, and this indeed a non-default warning. Thanks for taking the time to reply! --matt ^: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/aggregate_initialization#Designated_initializers
