https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > > integer, pointer :: p1 => null() > > integer, pointer :: p1 => null() > Module m looks wrong. Should the 2nd p1 be p2? It should be "p2(:)" (Thanks. I wrote it in the browser without cross checking – and as I planed to do it, the VMware had disk access issues. Thus, I just hit 'submit' while the browser was still running. Hence, there might be additional issues. I also planned to enumerate the 'stop 1'.)
