https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96668

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> >   integer, pointer :: p1 => null()
> >   integer, pointer :: p1 => null()

> Module m looks wrong.  Should the 2nd p1 be p2?
It should be "p2(:)"

(Thanks. I wrote it in the browser without cross checking – and as I planed to
do it, the VMware had disk access issues. Thus, I just hit 'submit' while the
browser was still running. Hence, there might be additional issues. I also
planned to enumerate the 'stop 1'.)

Reply via email to