https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85796
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #4) > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 08:13:31PM +0000, jvdelisle at charter dot net wrote: > > > > --- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- > > This looks OK Steve. Assuming your regression tested, shall I commit this > > for > > you? > > > > My regression test shows 22 regression, but none can be > associated with this patch. There are lto errors about > linking, which likely means gfortran is finding FreeBSD > ld (rtld) instead of binutils. > > I'm also getting an odd failure with 'gmake -j7 chec-fortran' > where a submake is dying with 'argument to -j must be positive'. > Odd? Ugh. configure is broken. I asked for --enable-languages=c,fortran. Because, I left out c++, configure helpfully added in c++,lto. Not good. Had to add --disable-lto. Regression tests fine.
