https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94393
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3) > There are two parts to fixing this PR. > 1) We can do better in the sequences generated for some constants. > 2) rs6000_rtx_costs needs to be accurate, so that expensive constants are > put in memory and stay there with optimisation. > > Having looked at part 2 a little, I'd say fixes for that are definitely not > stage 4 material. Alan, I think you pushed some changes to help with 1) above, correct? Is there more to do for 1)? As for 2), we're in stage1 now. Do you have ideas about what must be done there? Do we still want to do something for 2)?
