https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95917

--- Comment #5 from fdlbxtqi <euloanty at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
> (In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #3)
> > Jonathan. I am MAD at you. This is absolutely your fault. I told you to
> > always write inline and you guys do not then allow Herb Sutter to ban me.
> > Here is the fault in your own controlled codebase. Are you satisfied?
> > 
> > https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1630
> > 
> > YES! INLINE ALL YOUR FUNCTIONS. AVOID function pointers and virtual
> > functions as plagues.
> 
> 1. jonathan did not write this header - I did,
> 2. we all make mistakes, shouting at folks isn't the optimum way to get them
> fixed
> 3. this bloat can only occur IF you include a header you are NOT using.
> 
> i.e.
> #include <coroutine>
> in a source that has no coroutines.

Sorry. It is not your fault. What I am complaining about is that GCC now has
the 
 exactly the problem I talked about 10 days ago and he and Herb Sutter banned
me on C++ Core Guideline.

C++ Core Guideline is absolutely wrong here.

Reply via email to