https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291
--- Comment #24 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to bouanto from comment #23) > Created attachment 48685 [details] > Example of global assembly [...snip....; thanks for the feedback] > I attached an example of global assembly. Thanks. > I don't understand the ordering issue. > I also don't understand how gcc_jit_context_new_function is used here. I see that you have a balanced .pushsection/.popsection pair in your example. Is it ever the case that people might want to have a .pushsection, then some C code, then a .popsection? (and, by analogy, the same for libgccjit rather than C). That's the ordering issue I'm concerned about, since at that point it matters what order the hand-written asm is in relative to the compiler-generated asm.
