https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69493
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Why does our unpack<mode> expander use UNSPEC_UNPACK_128BIT at all, why can it not simply generate simple code (without unspecs) directly? (Same goes for "pack<mode>").