https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just to quote EVRP sees
<bb 2> :
_1 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<unsigned int>(f);
_2 = _1 & 1048575;
if (_2 != 0)
goto <bb 3>; [INV]
else
goto <bb 6>; [INV]
<bb 3> :
_3 = f.x;
_4 = (unsigned int) _3;
y_8 = _4 * 4096;
if (y_8 <= 199)
thus the f.x != 0 test has been folded by one of those $?%&! permature
fold-const transforms to
if ((BIT_FIELD_REF <f, 32, 0> & 1048575) != 0)
the fix is to get rid of those (and fix the "fallout").
