https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788
--- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #23) > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #20) > > Thanks a lot for reverting, Thomas, shall I further reduce the reproducer, > > or can you work with it now? > > I could use it to confirm that there is a bug, but the test case is > far too complex for analysis, and it is also not possible to put > it in the testsuite. So, at the moment, work on PR 93956 (a F95 wrong-code > bug, hence a high priority) is effectively blocked. > > So yes, I would appreciate a shorter reproducer, especially since > I plan to revisit the whole span and pointer area once gcc 10 > is out of the door. > > So, I'll mark this bug as WAITING for now. Ok, Simon and I try our best, working independently, me reducing the existing case further, and he tries to write a small reproducer from scratch.
