https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788

--- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #23)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #20)
> > Thanks a lot for reverting, Thomas, shall I further reduce the reproducer,
> > or can you work with it now?
> 
> I could use it to confirm that there is a bug, but the test case is
> far too complex for analysis, and it is also not possible to put
> it in the testsuite.  So, at the moment, work on PR 93956 (a F95 wrong-code
> bug, hence a high priority) is effectively blocked.
> 
> So yes, I would appreciate a shorter reproducer, especially since
> I plan to revisit the whole span and pointer area once gcc 10
> is out of the door.
> 
> So, I'll mark this bug as WAITING for now.

Ok, Simon and I try our best, working independently, me reducing the existing
case further, and he tries to write a small reproducer from scratch.

Reply via email to