https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94788

--- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> I'd like to understand what went wrong here... I suspect that
> the fix exposed another bug somewhere :-(
> 
> Is it possible to isolate a test case like that?  If that is
> the offending patch, I think it is probably about a pointer to a
> variable of a derived type, either via a function or as
> an argument (look at the test case to see what the patch
> fixes).

I'm on the way to condense the reproducer. At latest tomorrow you will get it.
I really hope we get this fixed before the gcc 10 release.

Reply via email to