https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94721
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #2)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> > Confirmed, thanks for the report.
>
> Sigh, thanks. I'm starting to realize now, that it seems that the
> *intention* of
> https://wg21.link/p1959r0 adopted in November was to remove support of <=>
> on function pointers, but the current post-Prague wording paper seems to
> still have wording leftovers that mislead me to the interpretation expressed
> in this issue. I would like to withdraw this issue now and I'm starting a
> CWG discussion instead. My apologize for the false alarm.
No worries at all. Closing as invalid then.
