https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Rich Felker from comment #2) > So basically the outcome of DR120 was allowing the GCC behavior? It still > seems like a bad thing, not required, and likely to produce exploitable bugs > (due to truncation of arithmetic) as well as very poor-performance code (due > to constant masking). Note this only matters when the size of the bit-field is less than the size of int.
