https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94557
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner <meissner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Just to be clear, this bug are only bugs in the GCC 9 branch, and it came about due to the back port of the patch for PR target/93932 to the GCC 9 branch. The master branch generates correct code. So, I'm not sure this warrants being a P1 blocker for the GCC 10 release.
