https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94513
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I guess the proper solution is to invoke the syscalls directly rather than going through the libc wrappers?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94513
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I guess the proper solution is to invoke the syscalls directly rather than going through the libc wrappers?