https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94132
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >Can we make this check more robust so valid usage isn't rejected? Why do you think it is valid?
- [Bug c++/94132] New: Valid usage of f... amir.ahmed.ansari at outlook dot com
- [Bug c++/94132] Valid usage of f... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/94132] Valid usage of f... amir.ahmed.ansari at outlook dot com
- [Bug c++/94132] Valid usage of f... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/94132] Valid usage of f... redi at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug c++/94132] Valid usage of f... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
