https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94042
--- Comment #34 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #29) > Sorry for all the troubles with my latest patch and thank you for fair > criticism. I've decided to revert the patch as soon as git starts working. > I'll work to find a better solution after this. Thanks! Btw, on powerpc64-linux your patch changed the allocation order of the non-volatile registers, which is a big regression (we need bigger stack frames that way).
