https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93964
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2020-03-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
1104 gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (name) == SSA_NAME
1105 && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name))
1106 && ! defined_in_sese_p (name, region->region));
the parameter has pointer type. Some disconnect between analyses predicates.
Ouch. It's from niters which niter analysis expanded that far.
(unsigned int) (long int) _1 + 4294967295
So we end up using _1 instead of _2 here which would have been fine :/