https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93739
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz at technion dot ac.il> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Oops, that was meant to be print_type<decltype(i)>() Ok, that's a better kludge than mine - it doesn't have the more serious shortcomings. That makes the motivation for this feature request more about convenience / aesthetics. It would still be nice to have.
