https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93199
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
- 77.83% 0.45% 16118 cc1plus cc1plus [.] (anonymous
namespace)::pass_cleanup_eh::execute ▒
- 77.38% (anonymous namespace)::pass_cleanup_eh::execute
- 77.29% cleanup_empty_eh_merge_phis
- 44.55% redirect_eh_edge_1
30.45% last_stmt
+ 4.01% lookup_stmt_eh_lp_fn
+ 2.96% remove_stmt_from_eh_lp_fn
2.77% gimple_block_label
0.55% get_eh_landing_pad_from_number
+ 16.68% add_stmt_to_eh_lp_fn
5.34% find_edge
+ 4.58% redirect_edge_succ
0.59% gimple_execute_on_growing_pred
that last_stmt figure looks odd tho (I blame perf for this). This is on
the original redhat bugzilla testcase btw, will check your reduced one.
