https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92659
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3) > I can't find any specification in C standard saying "the bitwidth of long > should >= the bitwidth of size_t". So at least theoretically it may be > insufficient. Right. Also size_t itself might only be 32 bits, so (size_t) 1 << 32 is no better than 1 << 32. I don't think this suggestion is a good idea.
