https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
             Blocks|                            |67491

--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
> > Author: jason
> > Date: Tue Nov  5 11:46:54 2019
> > New Revision: 277825
> > 
> > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277825&root=gcc&view=rev
> > Log:
> >     PR c++/88075 - Don't require 'bool' in a concept definition.
> > 
> >     * parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Support C++20
> >     concept-definition syntax without 'bool'.
> > 
> > Added:
> >     branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/concepts/no-bool1.C
> > Modified:
> >     branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
> >     branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot for this change!
> 
> Does this work with -fconcepts and if yes can we also get it for GCC7?
> Thanks a lot!

Well, the branch for GCC7 just closed, so, looks like not...


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

Reply via email to