https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On November 14, 2019 5:11:55 PM GMT+01:00, "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92486 > >--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >While I don't share this preference about assignments, SRA only >ignores padding when doing "total scalarization" aka the poor man's >aggregate copy propagation because in that mode it would have to >invent small accesses to copy padding and I'm sure some people would >be unhappy about those. Doing total scalarization as block copy in naturally aligned pieces would be another option, no?
