https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863
--- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Tobias, It was my intention to commit the patch for PR91926 to 9-branch tonight. I take it that there was no problem with yours? Cheers Paul On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 07:34, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91863 > > --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Author: burnus > Date: Mon Oct 28 07:33:29 2019 > New Revision: 277502 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277502&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Fortran] PR91863 - fix call to bind(C) with array descriptor > > PR fortran/91863 > * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc): Don't free data > memory as that's done on the Fortran side. > (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Handle void* pointers from > gfc_conv_gfc_desc_to_cfi_desc. > > PR fortran/91863 > * gfortran.dg/bind-c-intent-out.f90: New. > > > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind-c-intent-out.f90 > Modified: > trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
